The pandemic has radically transformed the standardized testing industry, breaking the long-standing dominance of high-stakes exams like the ACT. While testing isn't going away entirely, educators now have more flexibility to question the assumptions behind these assessments.
This shift is reflected in the recent changes to the ACT itself. The test is scaling back, making the Science section optional and shortening the overall exam "to make the testing experience more manageable for students."
The rationale reveals a key truth - ACT scores are largely a function of test preparation, not necessarily academic ability. Mastering the ACT is more about learning the test's idiosyncrasies than demonstrating higher-order skills.
This is why colleges are increasingly moving towards "test-optional" policies. The ACT content doesn't strongly correlate with the knowledge and critical thinking needed to succeed in college. Scores have limited utility for admissions decisions beyond triangulating GPAs and high school profiles.
For the ACT as a company, this presents a challenge. To stay relevant, they must prove the test provides colleges the data they need. The elimination of the Science section, for example, may be an attempt to make the exam more aligned with the curriculum.
Ultimately, the evolution of the ACT signals a broader rethinking of standardized testing's role in higher ed. As the non-profit organization transitions to private ownership, the pressure to monetize and modernize the exam will only intensify.
This could accelerate efforts by colleges to collectively develop "best practices" for using test scores. The goal will be ensuring these assessments genuinely reflect student readiness, not just test-taking prowess. It will be an interesting transition to watch unfold.
Storyboards College Admission Portfolios, LLC